{M:H:O} Flip-flop-flip on RSS.... The Liberhan report

Flip-flop-flip
on RSS


See how he flips-flops on the RSS,
first
exonerating it and later indicting it for conspiracy.
Liberhan (para 43.11, p241) refers
� to allegations of training
and rehearsal for the demolition,
but
concludes that,
� even though there are doubts,
� it was not safe to hazard a finding
about training in the absence of conclusive evidence.
But
he says in the very next page
(paras 43.15-27 p242-45) that
'it was never in dispute that they (karsevaks)
had the ability to carry out the demolition'
— which is exactly
the opposite of what he says earlier.
How come that
� 'there is no conclusive
� evidence of training for karsevaks for demolition'
in para 43.11 becomes,
'it was never in dispute that the
� karsevaks have the ability to carry
� out the demolition'
in para 43.19?

A flip-flop!
Again Liberhan notes
(paras 43.15/43.19/43.27) that
� tempers among the emotionally surcharged
� and belligerent karsevas started rising,
� but
concludes
(in para 158.10, page 917),
� against all the evidence to the contrary,
� that 'the theory or the claim made
� by the leaders of the movement' …
� 'does not carry conviction to conclude
that the demolition was carried out by
� the karsevaks spontaneously or sheer anger or emotions'.

Again a flip-flop!!
Liberhan notes
(paras 43.12/13, p253) that
a defiant group of karsevaks breached
� the security cordon
'despite the resistance offered by
the RSS swayamsevaks'

and
'the RSS swayamsevaks succeeded
� in physically throwing the intruders from the platform'
when
� 'no visible substantial resistance
was put up by the police or the
� administration for stalling the intruders'.
� All this was in the presence of
� Advani and M M Joshi.
� Thus the evidence clearly proves
� that the RSS, on its part,
was determined to protect the structure.

� But
in defiance of this direct evidence,
� he concludes,
� in the end, that the RSS was the main
conspirator to demolish the structure.
� But
why would the RSS volunteers
throw the intruders out if the RSS
was conspiring to demolish?

Again a flip-flop!!!

Suspicions as conclusions,
against evidence
Thus,
against all evidence in his possession
� and no evidence to support him except
his own high propensity to suspect,
Liberhan conclusively suspects that
not only Advani against whom Liberhan has,
� in possession,
� evidence that establishes that he had tried
� to prevent the demolition, and others,
� but,
also A B Vajpayee — yes Vajpayee —
was part of the conspiracy.

See his sequential
'logic'
for holding that the BJP leaders
� are culpable: one,
it cannot assumed even for a moment that L K Advani,
� A B Vajpayee and M M Joshi
did not know the designs of the parivar;
two
they could not have defied
the mandate of the parivar;
three,
the BJP is appendage of the parivar;
� four,
� they could not be given the benefit of doubt!
� (para 166.11, p943).

That is, they should be not exonerated,
� but
indicted, on doubt!

Is this logic any different from the gossip
in street corner tea stalls and coffee shops
� like how could
Dr Manmohan Singh be not aware
of the payoff in the Spectrum scam,
so he should also be indicted?

QED:
� The Liberhan report is worse than street corner gossip.


Sriram Savarkar ©
Hinduism is more a way of life than a method of worship.
Dharmo Rakshati Rakshithaha
If you protect Dharma, Dharma will in turn protect you.
Hindus, If people slap you once, slap them twice!

__._,_.___

Visit Our WebSite : www.MumbaiHangout.Org

             Forum : www.MumbaiHangout.net

Our Friends Network: http://social.mumbaihangout.org/home.php

------------------
DISCLAIMER :
------------------


This message serves informational purposes only and should not be viewed as an irrevocable indenture between anyone. If you have erroneously received this message, please delete it immediately and notify the sender at MumbaiHangOut-Owner@yahoogroups.com. The recipient acknowledges that any views expressed in this message are those of the Individual sender and no binding nature of the message shall be implied or assumed unless the sender does so expressly with due authority of The M.H.O. Group. M.H.O. reserves the right to repeal, change, amend, modify, add, or withdraw the contents herein without notice or obligation.
---------------------------------------------------
Note:- MHO is Not Responsible For Any Claims.
---------------------------------------------------

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___